Skip to main content

Sarbones Oxley - Overview


Sarbonex Oxley Act (SOX) or Investor Protection Act 2002

The Act was written by Senator Paul Sarbanes and Congressman Michael Oxley and enacted by the Congress of the United States in response to corporate management, accounting, and reporting scandals.
The Act has heightened the role of regulation within the accounting industry and with it the role of the US Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the newly created Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") in that regulatory process.
The Act represents the biggest change in the US corporate governance and reporting since the federal securities laws were first enacted in 1933 and 1934. The Act has required the SEC to issue more regulations within six months than the SEC had ever issued before in a similar period.
Among other things, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act establishes new or enhanced standards for corporate accountability and has increased penalties for corporate wrongdoing for SEC registrants.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in an effort to prevent accounting scandals and other reporting problems from recurring, and to rebuild public trust in US corporate business practices, financial reporting, and in the capital markets.

The Act created a new oversight organisation, PCAOB, which now regulates the auditors of US public companies; the SEC continues to regulate the public companies.

The Act requires the PCAOB to establish:

• auditing and related attestation standards
• quality control standards
• ethics standards
• professional standards on the independent auditors’ attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls

The Act also authorises the PCAOB to establish rules to implement and enforce auditor independence requirements. Previously, independence rules were established and enforced by the SEC for auditors of public companies and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") for auditors of private entities.

The Act gives the PCAOB authority on how it will develop and adopt its standards. The Act does recommend that the PCAOB gather input from outside experts during its standard setting process. The PCAOB agrees with the Act's recommendation and, consequently, develops its standards in an open, public process in which investors, the accounting profession, the preparers of financial statements, and others have the opportunity to participate. In order for a PCAOB standard to become final, however, it must be ratified by the SEC.
The purpose of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is to protect investors through:

• Disclosures that are more:
• Accurate
• Timely
• Comprehensive
• Understandable

• Enhanced Corporate Governance rules

• Stricter enforcement of the auditing profession by creating the PCAOB

• Improved internal controls over financial reporting

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires the annual report (Form 10-K or Form 20-F) of each US SEC registrant (except a registered investment company) to include a report addressing the following:
• A statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company
• A statement identifying the framework used by management to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting
• Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the company’s most recent fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not the company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective
• A statement that the registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in the annual report has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting

The cost of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, both in dollars and hours, has been a source of debate within the US. So much so that the SEC, with the PCAOB, held and will hold public roundtables to discuss the Act with constituents. The result of such roundtables has been further interpretive guidance from the PCAOB, including the June 2007 release of Auditing Standard No. 5, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements to assist in the most effective and efficient implementation of the Act's requirements.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CA Info - industrial training

Hi Friends, Here is the list of approved insitutions eligible for imparting Industrial training Approved Organisations - Eastern Region SIEMENS LIMITED 43 SHANTI PALLY E.M.BY PASS CALCUTTA 700042 CITI BANK N.A. TATA CENTRE 41,CHOWRINGHEE ROAD CALCUTTA 700071 RECKITT & COLMAN OF INDIA LTD 41,CHOWRINGHEE ROAD CALCUTTA 700071 BRITANIA INDUSTRIES LTD . 14, TARATALA ROAD CALCUTTA 700088 ICI INDIA LTD 34, CHOWRINGHEE ROAD CALCUTTA 700071 GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. INDUSTRY HOUSE 14TH FLOOR, 10, CAMAC STREET KOLKATA 700017 AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK 21, OLD COURT HOUSE STREET CALCUTTA 700001 BALMER LAWRIE CO. LTD 21, NETAJI SUBHAS ROAD CALCUTTA 700001 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED 2,GARIAHAT ROAD(S) DHAKURIA CALCUTTA 700068 SRF LIMITED EXPRESS BUILDING 1ST FLOOR BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002 INDIAN RAYON AND INDUSTRIES LTD RISHRA HOOGHLY 712249 PEPSI-COLA INDIA MARKETING COMPANY SREE MANJURI BLDG. SUITE NO.6 , 1ST FLOOR 8/1, MIDDLETON ROW CALCUTT

ECB vs FCCB

This is in response to the queries I received on whether ECB or FCCB is more convenient/liberal/less regulated. For guidelines on each of them, please refer to the links attached in the respective articles. FCCB http://www.icai.org/icairoot/publications/complimentary/cajournal_nov05/703-708.pdf . ECB http://www.icai.org/icairoot/publications/complimentary/cajournal_may04/p1216-19.pdf As regards which is more convenient, it always depends on the company raising funds. Historically, companies prefer ECBs over FCCBs . The RBI data for the month of December 2007 showed only 7 of 44 companies raising funds through FCCBs automatic route and all 7 companies preferring the ECB over FCCB through approval route. http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/ECB/pdfs/83662.pdf Government has said that it is contemplating relaxing norms governing external commercial borrowings (ECBs) to enable Indian corporates access higher foreign capital at low cost. Besides, a review is underway to remove restrictions on fo

Reverse Mortgage in India

Imagine a situation where you grow old and have managed to buy a house. However, you could not save enough for your retirement. You certainly need money to manage your day to day finances since you are retired and have no fixed source of income or your income is not enough to meet your finances. Reverse Mortgage is the answer for you. Reverse Mortgage is a type of mortgage available to senior citizens in which a home-owner can borrow money against the value of his/her home. No repayment of the mortgage (principal or interest) is required until the borrower dies or the home is sold. After accounting for the initial mortgage amount, the rate at which interest accrues, the length of the loan and rate of home price appreciation, the transaction is structured so that the loan amount will not exceed the value of the home over the life of the loan. [1] How does it work? Reverse Mortgage in India Realising the potential benefits of Reverse Mortgage, the Union Budget 2007-